# OpenMapTiles vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenMapTiles | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 3 211 | 29 389 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +41 | +112 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | PLpgSQL | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.

SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenMapTiles](https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openmaptiles.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openmaptiles-vs-srs