# OpenList vs TypeType

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenList | TypeType |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 34 in File Management | #66 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 25 344 ✓ | 471 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +575 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.2.9 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.12.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenList scores 80/100 against 48/100 for TypeType, so it is the safer default.

OpenList ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TypeType.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenList is easier to run; TypeType needs more configuration.

OpenList is growing faster right now (+575 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenList](https://selfhost.directory/project/openlist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openlist.md)
- [TypeType](https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typetype.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openlist-vs-typetype