# OpenList vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenList | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 34 in File Management | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 25 326 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +568 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v4.2.9 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenList scores 80/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

OpenList ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenList is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.

OpenList is growing faster right now (+568 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenList](https://selfhost.directory/project/openlist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openlist.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openlist-vs-tunesynctool