# OpenList vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenList | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 34 in File Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 25 334 ✓ | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +565 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.2.9 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenList scores 80/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.

OpenList ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenList is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.

OpenList is growing faster right now (+565 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenList](https://selfhost.directory/project/openlist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openlist.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openlist-vs-tube-archivist