# openHop Repeater vs Zot Registry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openHop Repeater | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 2 922 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +120 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Zot Registry scores 64/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.

Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.

If you want the quickest setup, Zot Registry is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.

Zot Registry is growing faster right now (+120 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openHop Repeater](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater.md)
- [Zot Registry](https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zot-registry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openhop-repeater-vs-zot-registry