# openHop Repeater vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openHop Repeater | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 24 049 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +789 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.

temporal is growing faster right now (+789 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openHop Repeater](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openhop-repeater-vs-temporal