# openHop Repeater vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openHop Repeater | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 51/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Network | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 298 | 61 536 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +492 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openHop Repeater.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openHop Repeater](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhop-repeater.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openhop-repeater-vs-pi-hole