# openHAB vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openHAB | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #11 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 160 | 13 311 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +301 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | EPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 66/100 for openHAB, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openHAB.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; openHAB needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openHAB](https://selfhost.directory/project/openhab) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openhab.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openhab-vs-stash