# OpenFan Controller vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenFan Controller | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 321 | 15 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +43 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026-10-09 · 9 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | CSS | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 50/100 for OpenFan Controller, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenFan Controller.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenFan Controller is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenFan Controller](https://selfhost.directory/project/openfan-controller) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openfan-controller.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openfan-controller-vs-peertube