# OpenEMR vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 5 555 | 56 870 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +87 | +141 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

OpenEMR ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-typst