# OpenEMR vs Tube Archivist

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | Tube Archivist |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 556 | 8 552 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 ✓ | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenEMR and Tube Archivist score the same (72/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [Tube Archivist](https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tube-archivist.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-tube-archivist