# OpenEMR vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 558 | 118 269 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 | +5 910 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 910 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-tradingagents