# OpenEMR vs timesheet

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | timesheet |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 38/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #10 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 5 555 ✓ | 171 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +87 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Vue |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenEMR scores 72/100 against 38/100 for timesheet, so it is the safer default.

OpenEMR ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for timesheet.

If you want the quickest setup, timesheet is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

OpenEMR is growing faster right now (+87 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [timesheet](https://selfhost.directory/project/timesheet) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/timesheet.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-timesheet