# OpenEMR vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 5 556 | 24 057 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +779 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-temporal