# OpenEMR vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 556 | 114 288 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +3 540 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

supabase is growing faster right now (+3 540 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-supabase