# OpenEMR vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 556 | 13 309 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +299 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

Stash is growing faster right now (+299 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-stash