# OpenEMR vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 557 | 29 392 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +89 | +113 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-srs