# OpenEMR vs SparkyFitness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | SparkyFitness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 5 555 | 6 503 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +87 | +392 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 27 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.10.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenEMR scores 72/100 against 66/100 for SparkyFitness, so it is the safer default.

SparkyFitness ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

If you want the quickest setup, SparkyFitness is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

SparkyFitness is growing faster right now (+392 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [SparkyFitness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sparkyfitness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-sparkyfitness