# OpenEMR vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 555 | 45 023 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +87 | +1 622 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 622 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-reactive-resume