# OpenEMR vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 5 557 | 61 554 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +89 | +492 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 6 |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-pi-hole