OpenEMRvspaperclip
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenEMR | paperclip | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 5 556 | 108 406 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +25 582 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2026.1012.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
paperclip scores 88/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.
paperclip ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.
If you want the quickest setup, paperclip is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.
paperclip is growing faster right now (+25 582 stars in 30 days).
OpenEMR details →paperclip details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenEMR, compare it with
Keep paperclip, compare it with