# OpenEMR vs OpenScribe

> Two self-hosted [Healthcare projects](https://selfhost.directory/healthcare), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | OpenScribe |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 5 555 ✓ | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +89 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenEMR scores 72/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.

OpenEMR ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenScribe is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

OpenEMR is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [OpenScribe](https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openscribe.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-openscribe