# OpenEMR vs OpenReader

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEMR | OpenReader |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Healthcare | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 556 ✓ | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 ✓ | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v5.4.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OpenEMR scores 72/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.

OpenReader ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenReader is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

OpenEMR is growing faster right now (+88 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)
- [OpenReader](https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openreader.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openemr-vs-openreader