# OpenELIS Global vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenELIS Global | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 6 053 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +101 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.

OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenELIS Global is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenELIS Global](https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openelis-global-2-vs-zammad