# OpenELIS Global vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenELIS Global | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 89 739 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 400 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

World Monitor scores 86/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for OpenELIS Global.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenELIS Global is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 400 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenELIS Global](https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openelis-global-2-vs-world-monitor