# OpenELIS Global vs sentry

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenELIS Global | sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 80/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 279 | 45 678 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +839 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 22 ✓ |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sentry scores 80/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.

sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for OpenELIS Global.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenELIS Global is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.

sentry is growing faster right now (+839 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenELIS Global](https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2.md)
- [sentry](https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sentry.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openelis-global-2-vs-sentry