# OpenELIS Global vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenELIS Global | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 5 in Healthcare | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 278 | 10 435 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +156 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

polar scores 71/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.

OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

If you want the quickest setup, OpenELIS Global is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

polar is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenELIS Global](https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openelis-global-2.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openelis-global-2-vs-polar