# OpenEats vs openGym

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OpenEats | openGym |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #10 of 18 in Recipe Management | #1 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 696 | 17 064 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 895 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.3 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Dockerfile | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

openGym scores 81/100 against 47/100 for OpenEats, so it is the safer default.

openGym ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for OpenEats.

If you want the quickest setup, openGym is easier to run; OpenEats needs more configuration.

openGym is growing faster right now (+2 895 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OpenEats](https://selfhost.directory/project/openeats) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openeats.md)
- [openGym](https://selfhost.directory/project/opengym) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opengym.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openeats-vs-opengym