openDCIMvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openDCIM | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 369 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 5 |
| Latest release | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.18.27 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
openDCIM details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep openDCIM, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with