openDCIMvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openDCIM | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 369 | 56 879 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +150 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 5 |
| Latest release | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
openDCIM details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep openDCIM, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with