# openDCIM vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openDCIM | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 369 | 24 063 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +785 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 82/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.

temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openDCIM](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opendcim-vs-temporal