# openDCIM vs signoz

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openDCIM | signoz |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 369 | 32 479 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +291 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 38 ✓ |
| Latest release | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.148.0 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

signoz scores 79/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.

signoz ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.

If you want the quickest setup, signoz is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.

signoz is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openDCIM](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim.md)
- [signoz](https://selfhost.directory/project/signoz) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signoz.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opendcim-vs-signoz