openDCIMvssignoz
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openDCIM | signoz | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #7 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 369 | 32 476 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 38 |
| Latest release | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.148.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
signoz scores 79/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.
signoz ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.
If you want the quickest setup, signoz is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.
signoz is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).
openDCIM details →signoz details →
Swap a project
Keep openDCIM, compare it with
Keep signoz, compare it with