# openDCIM vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openDCIM | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 369 | 15 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +43 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openDCIM](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendcim.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opendcim-vs-peertube