# Open Data Capture vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Data Capture | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Data Collection | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 119 | 6 050 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +98 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Zammad scores 70/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.

Open Data Capture ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Open Data Capture is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+98 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Data Capture](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendatacapture) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendatacapture.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opendatacapture-vs-zammad