# Open Data Capture vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Open Data Capture | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Data Collection | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 119 | 56 879 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +150 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.

Open Data Capture ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Open Data Capture needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Open Data Capture](https://selfhost.directory/project/opendatacapture) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opendatacapture.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opendatacapture-vs-typst