Open Data CapturevsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Data Capture | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Data Collection | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 119 | 40 372 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.
Open Data Capture ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
PhotoPrism is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
Open Data Capture details →PhotoPrism details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Data Capture, compare it with
Keep PhotoPrism, compare it with