# opencut vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | opencut | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 96 768 ✓ | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 147 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut scores 75/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

opencut ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 147 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencut-vs-workout-cool