opencutvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| opencut | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 96 768 | 8 654 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 147 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 1 |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
opencut scores 75/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
opencut ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.
opencut is growing faster right now (+6 147 stars in 30 days).
opencut details →Workout.cool details →