opencutvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| opencut | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 96 712 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 091 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 10 |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
opencut scores 75/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.
If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
opencut is growing faster right now (+6 091 stars in 30 days).
opencut details →Windows ARM details →