opencutvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| opencut | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 96 748 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 127 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 8 |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
opencut scores 75/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.
opencut is growing faster right now (+6 127 stars in 30 days).
opencut details →WBO details →