# opencut vs Urbit

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | opencut | Urbit |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 96 712 ✓ | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 091 ✓ | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | hoon |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut scores 75/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.

Urbit ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 091 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)
- [Urbit](https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/urbit.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencut-vs-urbit