# opencut vs Tdarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | opencut | Tdarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #2 of 18 in Video Processing |
| GitHub stars | 96 664 ✓ | 4 369 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 109 ✓ | +38 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Makefile |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut scores 75/100 against 66/100 for Tdarr, so it is the safer default.

opencut ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Tdarr.

If you want the quickest setup, Tdarr is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 109 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)
- [Tdarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tdarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencut-vs-tdarr