# opencut vs supabase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | opencut | supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 92/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 96 722 | 114 288 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 101 ✓ | +3 540 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 8 ✓ |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase scores 92/100 against 75/100 for opencut, so it is the safer default.

supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.

## Details

- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)
- [supabase](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Appwrite vs supabase](https://selfhost.directory/compare/appwrite-vs-supabase)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencut-vs-supabase