# opencut vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | opencut | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 96 671 ✓ | 13 308 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 116 ✓ | +302 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 7 ✓ |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 75/100 for opencut, so it is the safer default.

Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; opencut needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 116 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencut-vs-stash