# opencut vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | opencut | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 96 671 ✓ | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 116 ✓ | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 75/100 for opencut, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 116 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencut-vs-seaweedfs