# opencut vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | opencut | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 96 722 ✓ | 15 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 101 ✓ | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

opencut and PeerTube score the same (75/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.

If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

opencut is growing faster right now (+6 101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [opencut](https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opencut.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/opencut-vs-peertube