# openclaw vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 393 292 ✓ | 12 827 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 944 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 944 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-zookeeper