# openclaw vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 393 278 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 930 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 930 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-windows-arm