# openclaw vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | openclaw | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 393 247 ✓ | 117 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 899 | +5 254 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

openclaw scores 93/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.

openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

## Details

- [openclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openclaw.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/openclaw-vs-tradingagents